Sunday, March 8, 2015

Uncle Fred and the Gramophone

Part 1

Growing up as a pre-teen in my mother’s native England, I always heard family references to “Uncle Fred”, the older brother of my grandfather, Arthur Chinery. 

Frederick George Chinery seemed like a mythical figure to me.  My aunts spoke of him with great reverence.  They would recount the story of him having died in WWII due to the sinking of the boat he was on, by the Japanese, when Singapore was evacuated in 1942.   But, I just don’t remember them saying much more about him. 

I had also heard that when he left England, he left behind one of his possessions.  This item was his gramophone.  The gramophone was held in tight possession by his half sister Ethel May Norman (Flack).  And there were several people in our family that wanted to inherit this treasure.

Frederick George Chinery was born the 26th of February 1908 at Frinton Lodge, Great Holland, Essex, England. [1]  His parents were William Henry Chinery and Lydia Matilda Boreham.  Subsequent records search indicate that they were not married at the time of his birth.  In fact, in the UK 1911 Census, he and my grandfather are given the last name of Flack, Lydia’s last name from her deceased husband  Both their births are recorded as Chinery though.  Fredrick is the first of 4 children William and Lydia have together.  William had 5 children from a previous marriage; Lydia had three previous children.  Both of their first marriages ended due to death of their spouses.

My aunt Ethel, Fredrick’s older half sister was a very strong willed woman.  I remembered her well from my younger teenage years.  She had suffered a stroke at one point, and the prognosis was not good.  But she pushed through and eventually left the hospital.  She walked with the use of a cane as long as I could remember afterwards.  And she always kept her wits about her.

Several years later (about 1983-1984), I had returned to England now in my early 20’s.  I was in the USAF, and I would often drive to the Ipswich area to visit my grandparents.  On one of those visits, Aunt Ethel surprised me by asking if I would like to have Uncle Fred’s gramophone.  She remembered a story about me when I was a younger boy; I was fascinated with wind up gramophones and I had saved my allowance until I could afford to buy one for myself.  I quickly said yes, happy to be the new owner of this family heirloom. 

It was black, with gold lettering stenciled on the top.  The initials were FGC, although the F for some reason was very worn out.


It was around this time a letter to the editor of a local newspaper was brought to the attention of my grandfather.   The rest of the story takes another 30 years before it begins to play out.




[1] England, General Register Offices, Birth, Marriage and Death Registrations, Birth Registration; Apr-May-Jun; 1908; Registration District Tendring; County Essex; Volume 4a, Page 803, Line 350.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Serendipity in Genealogy

Serendipity: n-the occurrence and development of events by chance in a happy or beneficial way.

I have read stories on other blogs regarding “Serendipity in Genealogy” and finally had a serendipitous moment of my own.

I had been researching my cousin’s Farias line.  We are related via my father and their mother.  Our parents are first cousins on my Gonzalez side.  I was trying to see if I could connect our families via a Farias relation as well.  I had followed their line back to their 2nd great grandparents Fausto Farias and Epitasia Hinojosa.

My research led me to request a film be sent from the Family History Library in Salt Lake City to a local branch close to me.  The film reel (1016452) consisted of marriage certificates for the State of Texas, Starr County 1858-1916.  I had the marriage date as it had been indexed; 26 August 1878.  Now I want to see if the marriage certificate held any unknown information.


The reel started with 1858 and I needed to unwind it 20 years.  If anyone has done this before, that can be a lot of hand cranking.  When you are looking for a specific document, you start winding like crazy, stopping periodically to see how the date has come along.

As many of you can relate, we are rarely working in only one direction at one time.  Around the same time, I had also been researching the Vela line of my brother-in-law (my sister’s husband).   I had the names of his 2nd great grandparents Severo Vela and Estafana Garcia.  I had put forth a good amount of effort but I had not been able to find evidence of their marriage in the Mexico records I had been searching.

Serendipity happened on one of my pauses unwinding the film to check the date.  I had landed on 4 July 1869.  Still 9 years off my target.  As I scanned the screen looking for a date, the name Severo Vela registered in my brain.  I blinked a couple of times and took another look.  Sure enough, in front of my face, sat my brother in law’s 2nd great grandparents marriage certificate.


I had not thought to search on this side of the border for a record of their marriage.  Subsequently, I gave myself a slap on the forehead moment, when I proved if I had just used the United States in my search parameters, I would have returned results. 


By the way, I did also net my quarry that day of the other marriage certificate. 

Sunday, January 11, 2015

He Was Just A Name

Eleno Gonzalez...

One of the first names I placed in my tree “That First Night”.  It was a named I pulled off of FamilyTree.org with an un-sourced birthdate of “abt 1900”.  Believe me, that early in my new addiction, I wasn’t worried about the un-sourced part.

But as I have built my tree out, and spent time on Findagrave.com, I wanted to know more about this brother of my grandfather.   A couple of things came together that renewed my interest in trying to fill out his details in my tree; First, my father recently pointed him out in an old picture of an Easter Egg hunt I remember being a part of in 1969.  Hmmm, I actually met this man?  Granted, I was only 7 at the time, but that is still 1 degree of separation.  And second, as I stated in an earlier posts, I am cleaning up both my tree[1] on Ancestry.com and taking the time to fix what I have seen on Familysearch.

I have searched for records pertaining to him several times.  He has been in my tree since day one, and Ancestry would only have 3 hints; none of which pertained to him.  Google turned up nothing.  Asking older relatives that knew of him did not yield much more.  Lived in Corpus; sold radio advertising.  But still nothing.  Hmmph. 

When I got to his part of my tree it just bugged me again.  Someone had added his name and “about” birthdate on Familysearch.org some time ago and he was just kind of left like that.  He only ended up in my tree because he was tied to my g-grandparents records.

I started to dig again. 

This time I decided to try something different.  I searched for him on Ancestry without the search linking to his name in my tree.  Just a blind search; Eleno Gonzalez, DOB 1900 +- 10 years.  No parents, no siblings.  And this time I got a hit. 

It was a WWII registration document for an Eleno Gonzalez living in New Orleans in the early 1940’s.  It states he is from South Texas, and it had a birthdate that was in 1910.[2]   Hmmm, more information to search from…


So using this birthday I performed another search.  I hit on a death certificate from Corpus Christi, Texas in 1980.[3]   And low and behold, his parents are listed.  My g-Grandparents Ines Gonzales and Elena Longoria.

I have searched death certificates on Family Search with both those names listed as parents, and never came across his death certificate. 

Now that I knew I had the right guy, I started adding these records to my tree.  From that, new “Shaky leaves” popped up.   They indicated a marriage and a divorce.   They also indicated there were children from that marriage.  Cousins, I never knew of. 

Subsequently, from searches performed from that one blind search, I discovered he was married at least 2x’s, there are even more cousins I never knew of. 
Using the information I discovered, and some Internet sleuthing, I tracked down a couple of cousins from those lines on Facebook.  I messaged one of them and he responded back.  I introduced myself as a not too distant cousin and certainly unknown to each other until now.  I hope from this communication, I may learn more about this side of my family I seemed to know so little about.

And all of this because a brick wall was just bugging me so much. 

And I attempted a search with as little information as possible. 

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Clean It Up

Family Search Family Tree that is….

As I have said in a previous post, I have been spending more time cleaning up my tree rather than adding to it.[1]  It is amazing that during the cleaning process, you see things you missed the first time; so in essence, I continue to add to it.

One of the ways I have been doing some cleaning is with Familysearch.org

I guess I have a soft spot in my heart when it comes to Familysearch.org. It was because of their site I became hooked on my own ancestry a few years ago.[2] It was via a few clicks and I traveled hundreds of years into the past and learned names, that were instrumental in my being here today, I had never heard before.

It was because of the family trees that were upload on their site I was able to do this easily.  But even on that first night on line, I could tell the tree I looked at was wrought with errors. Duplicate names, skipped generations....

They now have a new product call Family Tree.  It is wide open for anyone to use.  Even though it is supposed to be a one-world tree, their records needed a lot of attention. I started adding my deceased relatives to their community tree. I only had to go back to my grandparent’s generation before I starting finding record of my ancestors already in the tree. 
 
Family Tree assigns everyone a unique alphanumeric number.  I have found though, as records are added, duplicates are a problem. This is where we come in.  I started slowly (slowly being the key word) adding and merging members of my direct tree.  Merging is a complex process, something I am still getting the hang of, but it is becoming easier. Family Search has many video tutorials on how to use their product.[3]  They are helpful to watch. 

To make the process easier, I put my tree on Ancestry.com up on one screen, and Family Search Family Tree up on the other; I have been going person by person down my direct line.  Again, this has given me the chance to clean up my tree as I go along. This time I am not in a race to see how quickly I can go back in time.

SOURCES, SOURCES, SOURCES

Family Tree allows anyone to add or make edits to profiles already in the tree.   This of course can become annoying with anyone insisting on family lore as a fact without backing it up with evidence.  I will put all records I add or edit on my "watch" list. That way, I will be alerted when someone makes a change to their record.  If you are going to get on the Family Search bandwagon, only do so if you are willing to do the extra work and add your sources and reasoning. 

It is time consuming yet rewarding. Facing the fact that there are probably records of your ancestors already on there, you might as well have a hand in sharing what you have learned and making that public tree right.

Besides, one late night, you may help a cousin you are yet to meet, get hooked on genealogy.


Monday, November 24, 2014

Doniciana and Doniciano-The Disappearing Twins

On 21 August 1881, Salome (Gonzalez) Gonzalez my 2nd great grandmother gave birth to her 9th and 10th children.  It is amazing the size of families our ancestors created, but to imagine having natural twins that far down the birth order in 1881 is incredible.  Luckily, in a time of high mother and infant mortality, she survived that birth and lived to be at least 83 years old.

When their father Nestor went to record the births in the Civil Register of Births for Santander Jimenez, Tamaulipas, they are named Doniciana and Doniciano. [1]


I had been combing the birth records of this town building this family tree.  Every time I added an addition name, I would then search for other marriage and death records trying to build out their lives. 

But the twins disappeared.  It was difficult enough to come up with either a Doniciana or Doniciano Gonzalez in records, let alone, finding good candidates based on birth year.  Sadly I assumed they had died young, so I combed the death records for the date directly following their births.  Nothing!  I was relieved but frustrated.  I moved on. 

Months later, I realized I had missed a whole set of baptism records.  Not that I was looking for one person in particular for I would spend hours in front of the computer reading records, page by page.   One night, while reviewing these missed records, I came across another set of twins for Salome and her husband Nestor.  They were named Maximiana and Maximiano.  How cute; but another set of twins for this poor woman!!

As I went about recording their baptisms, I was struck by the year.  The baptism record indicated the birthdate of the twins; it was the same birthdate as Doniciana and Doniciano.[2]

No wonder I could not find anything else out about them. Had they change their names or did the person recording their births get it wrong?  

Not that I am absolutely sure I found them in adulthood.  But that is another story.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Clementina Cross d. 1874 b. 1875 - How does that work?

From time to time I come across family records that can be confusing.   My great grandmother Clementina Maud (Cross) Page was born in Walberswick, Suffolk, England on 16 Dec 1875.  She was the daughter of Benjamin Cross and Rachel (Howard) Cross.

When I first started researching this line, I had plenty of records to indicate my g-grandmothers birth year. Imagine my surprise when she started showing up in the 1861 and 1871 England census. [1]

Or was it really her?

I assumed that there was in fact another Clementina Cross.  An obviously older sister.  I assumed that she had died at a young age, but had been unable to find a record to prove that point.

Tonight, I finally came up with a reference to her death.  In the England & Wales BMD death index, her death was recorded the 3rd quarter of 1874.[2]  I will now have to order that death certificate and see if it better explains her fate.

My g-grandmother was born year and a half later.[3]

Wouldn't it be strange to be named after a dead sibling?  Living in a household called by the same name as a sister that had been around for 15 years previous to you.

Interestingly, I believe I have found evidence of this practice on my Mexican side as well.

While I am sure that this was done to honor the dead, it's an interesting tradition that seems to have fallen away in our current culture.

Thankfully in my opinion.


[1] England 1861, Class: RG 9; Piece: 1179; Folio: 83; Page: 10; GSU roll: 542769.
{2} England & Wales, Free BMD Death Index, 1837-1915, 1874, 3rd quarter, Blything, Suffolk, 4a, 394
[3] England & Wales, Free BMD Death Index, 1837-1915, 1875, 4th quarter, Blything, Suffolk, 4a, 75

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Cleaning My Tree

When I first started this project, my aunt on my mother's side, gave me a lot of her previous research. Amongst the documents were many birth and death records she had retrieved from various record offices when she visited England.

In my overzealous state to "digitize everything" I scanned them on my home scanner.  The problem is my scanner bed was too small for many of the older records.  It would cut some of the edges off. At the time this obviously didn't concern me too much.  I just loaded up in my tree.

This is the record of my great uncle Albert's death in 1937.   As you can see the right edge is cut off.


I decided that this just wasn't good.  As I have mentioned before, I have been spending more time lately cleaning up my tree rather than adding to it.  So, I went to the local office store and handed over a stack of oversized documents and had them scanned.  Here is the difference.


Much better.